3 Degrees Asset Management
profileredflag
Red Flags

15

3 Degrees Asset Management

3 Degrees Asset Management has been embroiled in multiple controversies, indicating significant financial misconduct, unethical behavior, and a lack of transparency.

Quick summary on 3 Degrees Asset Management

3 Degrees Asset Management has faced multiple controversies, raising concerns about its practices.

Regulatory Violations: The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) ordered its closure for compliance lapses, including a $6.7 million misappropriation linked to the founder. Inadequate risk management and misleading clients about investments compounded the issue.

Legal Disputes: Allegations of FCCB fraud involving Karur KCP Packagings and misleading clients about high-risk investments have surfaced. These actions indicate potential financial misconduct and unethical behavior.

Censorship and Information Suppression: The firm allegedly censored negative press and suppressed regulatory documents, aiming to avoid scrutiny. Such actions suggest efforts to conceal non-compliance and maintain a favorable public image.

Unethical Investment Practices: Reports claim the firm prioritized its profits over client welfare by pushing risky investments without adequate disclosure, raising questions about its integrity.

Customer Complaints: Investors have criticized the firm for poor communication, undisclosed risks, and significant financial losses, reflecting a lack of transparency and accountability.

Did we miss any intel on 3 Degrees Asset Management?

use feedback and discussion on 3 Degrees Asset Management

2.3/5

Based on 2 ratings

Trust
30%
Risk
90%
Brand
20%
by: John Miller

Misleading and manipulative! They made risky investments sound safe. Lost a lot because of them..

by: Emma Watson

No transparency at all. Felt like they were hiding something from day one..

Add Reviews

  • Trust
  • Risk
  • Brand

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image