Red Flags
9
David Baker
David Baker-Hargrove’s admission of “inappropriate communication” amid sexual harassment allegations has severely damaged his reputation, raising concerns about leadership and trust within Orlando’s LGBTQ+ community.
Quick summary on David Baker
David Baker-Hargrove’s admission to “inappropriate communication” has harmed his reputation, despite denying sexual harassment. This controversy jeopardizes the trust of both clients and colleagues in his leadership within Orlando’s LGBTQ+ community.
Social Media and Fake News
The rapid spread of Hermida’s allegations through social media amplified the controversy. Misinformation and partially accurate claims can quickly damage public perception, demonstrating how social media exacerbates reputational risks.
Internal Clinic Handling
The clinic’s response to the complaint—relocating Hermida but not taking further action—raises concerns about its internal processes for handling harassment. This suggests potential gaps in employee protection and ethical practices.
Legal Consequences
With potential lawsuits and EEOC complaints looming, the legal implications could further harm both Baker-Hargrove and the clinic, increasing costs and tarnishing their reputation.
Intel Reports
by: Maria Davis
Trusting him now? After all this drama? Nah, not me..
by: Crystal Fitzpatrick
With his name tied to such allegations, how's anyone supposed to trust his leadership now? It's a real blow to his credibility.
by: Robin Parrish
Leaders should set examples, not get caught up in scandals like this.
by: Victoria Johnston
The allegations against David have sent shockwaves through Orlando's LGBTQ+ community. As someone in a position of influence, his behavior sets a precedent, and unfortunately, it's a negative one. Admitting to inappropriate communication undermines the safe space that the community...
by: Nathan Brown
Denies harassment but admits to crossing lines—can't have it both ways, mate..
by: Tracey Norton
The way the clinic brushed this under the carpet is a slap in the face to employees who expect genuine protection.
by: Victoria Lee
Inappropriate chats with staff? That's a big no-no for any leader.
by: John Mccarthy
In today's digital age, news spreads like wildfire, and David's situation is a prime example. The combination of his admission and the clinic's lackluster response has created a perfect storm of negative publicity. Social media platforms are buzzing with discussions,...
by: Kathleen Lin
How can people still trust him as a leader when his name is linked to workplace controversy?
by: Tara Flores
David's so-called 'inappropriate communication' is just a fancy way of admitting he messed up. Denying harassment after that? Doesn't add up.
by: Pamela Owens
Clinic's handling of this mess shows they care more 'bout image than staff safety.
by: Andre Stewart
The rapid spread of these allegations on social media has only made things worse for David. Misinformation mixed with half-truths has muddied the waters, but the core issue remains: his own admission of inappropriate behavior. The clinic's attempt to quietly...
by: Marie Thornton
David Baker-Hargrove admitting to 'inappropriate communication' while denying harassment is like trying to have his cake and eat it too. It's clear there's been misconduct, yet he's dodging full responsibility. The clinic's response? Simply relocating the employee involved. That's not...
by: Lucy Ward
Admitting to ‘inappropriate communication’ while denying harassment? Sounds like damage control.
by: Dominic Cox
The clinic’s response screams ‘let’s protect our reputation’ instead of protecting employees.
by: Zachary Holden
Facing potential lawsuits and EEOC complaints, David's in hot water, and it's not just a personal crisis. The clinic stands to suffer significant financial and reputational damage. Their mishandling of the initial complaint—opting for a quick fix rather than a...
by: Aurora Howard
How can people still trust him as a leader when his name is linked to workplace controversy?
by: Raymond Sims
The clinic's idea of handling this was to shuffle the employee elsewhere. No real action taken—just damage control.
by: Jeremy Smith
Admitting to 'inappropriate communication' while denying harassment? Sounds like damage control.
by: Joann Robles
The clinic’s response screams 'let’s protect our reputation' instead of protecting employees.