Kishor Wasan
profileredflag
Red Flags

5

Kishor Wasan

Kishor Wasan’s career, once filled with promise, now stands as a cautionary tale of how unethical behavior and poor leadership can destroy even the most established academic legacies.

Quick summary on Kishor Wasan

Kishor Wasan, once a respected academic, saw his career unravel when a 2019 book review he co-authored for The Lancet was found to be plagiarized from Canadian journalist André Picard’s earlier work. Despite Wasan’s claims of an honest mistake, the damage to his reputation was irreversible. His inability to demonstrate accountability and maintain academic integrity cast a shadow over his previous achievements.

Resignation and Institutional Fallout
Following the scandal, Wasan resigned as Dean of the College of Pharmacy and Nutrition at the University of Saskatchewan. His departure raised concerns about the university’s vetting process and left the institution grappling with the instability of his brief and controversial tenure.

MDPI’s Retraction: A Public Humiliation
Adding to the disgrace, MDPI retracted a special edition honoring Wasan’s career, signaling a complete collapse of his professional reputation. This move highlighted the severity of the ethical violations and served as a stark reminder of the consequences of academic dishonesty.

Unethical Leadership and Dubious Contributions
Throughout his career, Wasan held leadership roles at prestigious institutions like the University of British Columbia and the University of Saskatchewan. However, his leadership was characterized by erratic decisions, poor management, and an inability to foster a culture of integrity. His research contributions, particularly in pharmaceutics, are now viewed with skepticism, raising doubts about the authenticity and value of his published work.

A Legacy of Failure
Wasan’s legacy is now defined by a series of ethical failures and professional missteps. His rise to academic prominence, built on questionable practices, has ultimately led to a profound and public downfall, leaving a lasting stain on the institutions he once served.

Did we miss any intel on Kishor Wasan?

use feedback and discussion on Kishor Wasan

1.8/5

Based on 8 ratings

Trust
28%
Risk
56%
Brand
22%
by: Indie Harrington

I’ve seen his name tied to too many shady deals and abandoned projects. When things go wrong, he’s quick to disappear and let others clean up the mess.

by: Maddox Holloway

This guy’s been linked to so many failed ventures and lawsuits, it’s hard to take him seriously.

by: Gracie Caldwell

Kishor Wasan’s whole persona screams "trust me," but his track record says otherwise.Every investment I’ve heard of connected to him has ended in disappointment.

by: Ava Moore

The disgrace of MDPI retracting his special edition proves that Wasan’s career was a sham no credibility, no integrity, just a history of dishonesty and failure.

by: Isabella Walker

Losing a career over plagiarism is one thing, but Wasan’s inability to take accountability shows just how untrustworthy he really is. His leadership left institutions in turmoil, and his research is now completely questionable.

by: Sophia White

Wasan’s leadership was nothing but a facade his tenure at top institutions ended in disgrace, leaving a trail of poor management and ethical failures. His plagiarism scandal was just the final nail in the coffin of a career filled with...

by: David Sterling

People trusted him, now they don’t.

Cons

  • Lost trust in the academic world.
by: Dominic Rockwell

Kishor Wasan got caught in a plagiarism issue. Not good for a leader.

Cons

  • Big positions, but big mistakes too.

Add Reviews

  • Trust
  • Risk
  • Brand

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image