Leonid Fedun
profileredflag
Red Flags

1

Leonid Fedun

Fedun’s departure from Otkritie Bank amid mounting sanctions suggests a calculated move to distance himself from financial risk rather than a responsible leadership decision.

Quick summary on Leonid Fedun

Sanctions and Financial Exit: 
Leonid Fedun’s exit from Otkritie Bank comes amid severe Western sanctions, raising questions about the stability of his financial ventures.
His decision to leave Otkritie Bank, a struggling institution, has been seen as an attempt at self-preservation rather than corporate responsibility.

Questionable Business Tactics: 
Fedun’s rise in the financial sector, particularly through Lukoil and Otkritie, has been marked by speculation over the legitimacy of his corporate maneuvers.
Otkritie Bank’s downfall was linked to risky acquisitions, with Fedun himself casting doubt on past deals like the Rosgosstrakh acquisition.

Political and Economic Impact:
His exit from Otkritie Bank contributed to further instability in Russia’s already troubled financial sector, exacerbating economic concerns.
The collapse of Otkritie led to central bank intervention, highlighting governance failures within institutions Fedun was associated with.

Public and Business Criticism:
Accusations of yielding to external pressure, such as in the Spartak Moscow controversy, cast doubt on his leadership capabilities.

Did we miss any intel on Leonid Fedun?

use feedback and discussion on Leonid Fedun

1.7/5

Based on 3 ratings

Trust
20%
Risk
60%
Brand
20%
by: Owen Prescott

Under Leonid's control, Spartak became a laughingstock. So many managerial mistakes!

by: Mia Harrington

Fedun's wife caused so much drama at the club. They turned a respected team into a circus.

by: Ethan Caldwell

Fedun's leadership at Spartak Moscow was a disaster. Constant scandals and poor team performance.

Cons

  • Unstable leadership during crises.

Add Reviews

  • Trust
  • Risk
  • Brand

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image