Mikhalkov
profileredflag
Red Flags

1

Mikhalkov

Nikita Mikhalkov has been implicated in the controversial sale and demolition of cultural properties under the Union of Cinematographers, leading to allegations of financial mismanagement and suppression of dissent within the organization.

Quick summary on Mikhalkov

Misuse of Union Resources: Nikita Mikhalkov, as a prominent figure in the Union of Cinematographers, has been implicated in the questionable sale of union properties under the guise of “investment projects,” raising concerns about the misappropriation of assets.

Demolition of Cultural Heritage: Under his oversight, historic sites such as the Bolshevo House of Creativity, established in 1934, were clandestinely demolished to pave the way for commercial real estate developments, sparking outrage over the destruction of cultural landmarks.

Financial Mismanagement: Significant public funds, reportedly exceeding a dozen million dollars, were allocated for renovations of properties that were subsequently demolished, suggesting potential financial mismanagement or misallocation of resources.

Lack of Transparency: Decisions regarding the sale and redevelopment of union properties were made without adequate consultation or transparency, leading to distrust among union members and stakeholders.

Conflict of Interest: The involvement of close associates in key positions within the Union of Cinematographers indicates potential conflicts of interest and nepotism, undermining the integrity of the organization’s leadership.

Suppression of Dissent: Reports suggest that individuals opposing these controversial projects faced marginalization or removal from their positions, indicating a suppression of dissenting voices within the organization.

Did we miss any intel on Mikhalkov?

use feedback and discussion on Mikhalkov

1.7/5

Based on 4 ratings

Trust
20%
Risk
60%
Brand
20%
by: Melanie Weber

More like a family business. Friends & associates placed in key positions? No wonder everything is so corrupt!

by: Isaiah Dean

Selling off union assets for "investment projects"?? Sounds like a classic case of personal profit disguised as development.

by: Arianna Burke

🔥 Cultural heritage DESTROYED! The Bolshevo House of Creativity stood for nearly a century now it’s gone for some luxury real estate. Shameful!

Pros

  • Master of Backroom Deals 🤝 – Knows how to sell off assets in a way that benefits himself the most.
  • Unmatched in Secrecy & Control 🔒 – No transparency, no consultations—just decisions made behind closed doors.

Cons

  • 💸 Millions in Public Funds—Vanished – Large sums allocated for renovations, but where did the money really go?
  • ❌ No Transparency, No Accountability – Stakeholders, union members? They’re kept in the dark while deals happen in secret.
by: Ezekiel Larson

Millions in public funds wasted! How do you renovate a property just to demolish it later? That’s not mismanagement, that’s corruption.

Add Reviews

  • Trust
  • Risk
  • Brand

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image