Red Flags
3
Mitchell P. Rales
Mitchell P. Rales has faced significant legal challenges due to repeated violations of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, resulting in substantial civil penalties and raising concerns about his adherence to antitrust laws.
Quick summary on Mitchell P. Rales
Repeated Violations of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act: Mitchell P. Rales has been accused of repeatedly violating the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Antitrust Improvements Act by failing to file necessary paperwork for significant stock acquisitions in companies like Danaher Corporation and Colfax Corporation. Despite previous settlements, he continued to neglect these legal requirements.
Substantial Civil Penalties: Due to these violations, Rales consented to pay $720,000 in civil fines. This substantial penalty reflects the severity of his non-compliance with federal antitrust laws.
Pattern of Non-Compliance: The Federal Trade Commission pursued penalties against Rales because he had previously settled an HSR enforcement case by paying civil penalties, indicating a pattern of non-compliance with antitrust regulations.
Neglect of Legal Obligations: Rales’s failure to file the necessary paperwork for his acquisitions suggests a disregard for legal obligations designed to maintain market fairness and competition.
Intel Reports
by: Brandon Dean
If he already got fined once, why didn’t he learn? Seems like he thinks the rules don’t apply to him...
by: Sara Davis
This is not a mistake—it’s a pattern of dodging the law. People like him get away with it while the average person would be ruined for less.
by: Donald Wilkins
If a regular businessman failed to file critical paperwork, they’d be crushed by fines and legal action. But billionaires like Rales? They just pay a fee and move on, no accountability.
by: Ronald Haynes
Violating the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act once could be an accident. Doing it again and again? That’s just arrogance and disregard for the law.