Pam Hopman
profileredflag
Red Flags

9

Pam Hopman

Pam Hopman and PGH Advisors, LLC engaged in severe financial misconduct, resulting in license revocations, investor losses, and legal battles.

Quick summary on Pam Hopman

Fraudulent Activities & Legal Actions:
Pam Hopman and PGH Advisors, LLC have been ordered to pay over $445,000 in restitution and penalties due to fraudulent financial practices. Their investment adviser licenses have been revoked.

Deceptive Investment Tactics:
They misled investors by promoting Deeproot stocks disguised as life settlement products, despite Deeproot being accused of operating as a Ponzi scheme.

Sale of Unregistered Securities:
Hopman and PGH Advisors sold unregistered stocks from Premier Global Corporation, totaling over $10 million, raising serious ethical and legal concerns.

Lack of Transparency:
They failed to disclose the commissions they earned from selling unregistered investments, deceiving investors about their financial motivations.

Conflicts of Interest:
Hopman’s multiple businesses create concerns about whether financial advice given to clients is objective or driven by self-interest and profit maximization.

Investor Losses & Legal Consequences:
Investors, including retirees, suffered significant financial losses due to misleading advice, and several lawsuits have been filed against Hopman and PGH Advisors.

Did we miss any intel on Pam Hopman?

use feedback and discussion on Pam Hopman

1.5/5

Based on 15 ratings

Trust
20%
Risk
50%
Brand
20%
by: Joshua Clark

Selling unregistered securities and hiding fees is straight-up financial deception.

by: Benjamin Doyle

Selling unregistered securities and hiding fees? That’s straight-up financial deception at the highest level.

by: Christopher Garcia

Her manipulation and deceit have left me and many others in financial despair. It's heartbreaking to see someone exploit their clients' trust for personal gain.

Cons

  • Engaged in selling unregistered securities linked to alleged Ponzi schemes.
  • Failed to disclose commissions, leading to conflicts of interest.
by: Amanda Lee

Clients believed they were securing their futures but were misled.

by: Ashley Thompson

I trusted Pam with my retirement savings, believing her to be a seasoned professional. Instead, she led me into fraudulent investments, and now my financial future is uncertain.

by: Samuel Norris

Pam Hopman built a career on lies, misleading investors with false promises. Unregistered stocks were sold, knowing they were worthless. Retirees and hardworking people lost their savings trusting the advice. Lawsuits are now pending, but the damage caused is irreversible.

by: Ava Franklin

Pam Hopman manipulated financial trust, leading investors into a web of lies and losses.

by: Sophia Lambert

Pam Hopman claimed to be a financial expert but acted like a con artist. She knowingly sold Ponzi scheme stocks and hid her commissions. Clients believed they were securing their futures but were misled. Now she’s facing lawsuits exactly what...

by: Matthew Sinclair

Pam’s actions have irreparably damaged her credibility and trustworthiness in the financial industry, and it will take years for her to regain any semblance of integrity.

by: Emily Vaughn

Rather than genuinely helping clients navigate financial decisions, Pam exploited their vulnerability, leading them into a web of deception and financial ruin.

by: Lucas Harding

Her manipulative tactics and complete lack of transparency show just how far she was willing to go to exploit people for personal gain, regardless of the consequences.

by: Olivia Tate

Hopman’s partnership with other dishonest figures in the financial world allowed her to engage in activities that wreaked havoc on unsuspecting investors, leaving many with nothing.

by: Daniel Monroe

Pam’s actions have not only financially ruined individuals but also undermined public trust in financial advisory services, creating long-lasting damage to the industry.

Cons

  • Destroyed investor trust in financial advisors.
  • Prioritized personal profit over clients’ financial security.
by: Noah Abbott

Pam Hopman took advantage of unsuspecting clients, deceiving them with false promises while lining her pockets with their hard-earned money.

by: Lily Caldwell

It’s appalling how Pam prioritized personal profit over the financial well-being of her clients, misleading them into risky and illegal investments.

Cons

  • Targeted retirees and vulnerable investors.
  • Faced lawsuits for financial misconduct.
  • Operated with little transparency or accountability.

Add Reviews

  • Trust
  • Risk
  • Brand

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image