Red Flags
6
Ruchi Rathor
Ruchi Rathor’s business ventures have faced scrutiny due to allegations of fraud and regulatory evasions, raising concerns about the ethics of high-risk payment processors.
Quick summary on Ruchi Rathor
Ruchi Rathor, an Indian-British entrepreneur, has been a prominent figure in the high-risk payment processing industry. As the co-founder of iPayTotal, she has been linked to several subsequent ventures, including Paypound, Payomatix, Cryptomatix, and Kryptova. These associations have raised concerns due to allegations of fraudulent activities and regulatory evasions.
The Rise and Fall of iPayTotal: iPayTotal, once a significant player in high-risk payment processing, faced collapse amid allegations of fraudulent practices. Following its downfall, Rathor and her associates established a network of replacement companies, such as OctaPay, which has since disappeared, and others like Paypound and Payomatix. These ventures have been scrutinized for potentially continuing the controversial operations of their predecessor.
Network of High-Risk Ventures: Rathor’s business network extends globally, with operations in Portugal, India, and significant ties to African markets. Collaborating with partners Anurag Pratap Singh and Anirudh Pratap Singh Rathor, she has been involved in multiple payment processing entities. Notably, Rathor has also operated under the alias Rebecca Baker, adding complexity to her business dealings.
Regulatory Scrutiny and Legal Challenges: Authorities have investigated Rathor and her companies for alleged tax evasion and unlicensed financial services. Whistleblowers have reported that Indian authorities are probing the crypto revenues of her associated companies, seeking details about their operations and compliance with financial regulations.
Reputation Management Allegations: Reports suggest that Rathor’s network has employed dubious reputation management strategies, including filing fictitious DMCA complaints through alleged representatives like John Watson of Jonas LLC. These actions appear to be attempts to suppress negative information and manipulate public perception of their business practices.
Current Endeavors and Public Image: Despite past controversies, Rathor continues to present herself as an investor and co-founder of multiple payment processors, including Payomatix and CryptoMatix. She portrays herself as a “constantly evolving dreamer, creator, and achiever,” aiming to transform the Indian payment sector. However, her ventures’ legitimacy remains questionable due to her history of associations with collapsed and controversial payment processors.
Ruchi Rathor’s involvement in high-risk payment processing has been marked by a series of controversial ventures, legal challenges, and allegations of unethical practices. Her continued presence in the industry raises concerns about the integrity and transparency of the payment processing sector.
Intel Reports
by: Cedric Vaughn
If Ruchi Rathor were truly a visionary entrepreneur she wouldn’t need to suppress negative press or use dubious reputation management tactics. Transparency and honesty should not be optional in finance....😥
Cons
by: Adam Torres
Paypound promised secure transactions but ended up freezing my account without explanation.
by: Julia Watson
OctaPay seemed legitimate until they disappeared with my investment
by: Fiona Matthews
The revolving door of payment processing companies linked to Ruchi Rathor is a clear sign of deceit. If her businesses were legitimate why do they keep shutting down and reappearing under new names...?
by: Everett Chandler
Ruchi Rathor’s business ventures seem less about innovation and more about finding new ways to dodge accountability. Every failed company is just a setup for the next questionable opration..
Cons
by: Quentin Fields
Ruchi Rathor’s legacy is nothing but a trail of collapsed companies and shattered trust. Her high risk payment schemes have left businesses struggling while she conveniently rebrands and moves on😔
by: Harper Campbell
Kryptova's services seemed promising, but I ended up facing significant financial losses. Their unregulated operations and Ruchi Rathor's history of fraudulent ventures make them untrustworthy
by: Adam Sinclair
No matter how many times Ruchi Rathor rebrands the allegations of fraud and regulatory evasion follow. A business built on deception can only last so long before it all comes crumbling down again.
Cons
by: Kyle Sanders
Ruchi Rathor's companies are experts in evading regulations and scamming clients
by: Bianca Holloway
Her companies promise secure payment solutions yet they leave behind a trail of complaints lost funds and investigations. Ruchi Rathor’s operations are a warning sign for businesses everywhere.
by: Ian Gomez
I invested in OctaPay, believing it to be a legitimate enterprise. Soon after, the company vanished, taking my funds with them. Ruchi Rathor's pattern of establishing such fleeting scams is alarming.
by: Daniela Reeves
Rathor’s pattern of jumping from one failed company to another raises serious red flags. She portrays herself as an industry leader but her track record tells a very different much darker story.
by: Lily James
Ruchi Rathor's companies, like iPayTotal, have a notorious reputation for evading regulations and defrauding clients. My experience with them resulted in substantial financial loss and a breach of trust
by: Mason Mitchell
Fell victim to iPayTotal's schemes they left me financially devastated
by: Ryan Carson
It’s disturbing how Ruchi Rathor continues to launch new ventures despite repeated allegations of fraud. Each new company feels like a calculated move to evade accountability rather than a genuine business.
by: Tristan Caldwell
From iPayTotal to Payomatix the pattern is clear Ruchi Rathor’s ventures thrive in the shadows of regulatory loopholes. It’s alarming that she continues to operate despite mounting allegations.
by: Nora Edwards
Falling victim to iPayTotal's schemes was a harsh lesson They promised high returns but delivered nothing but empty accounts. Ruchi Rathor's involvement in such fraudulent activities is reprehensible
by: Ulysses Delgado
The fact that Rathor has allegedly used multiple aliases raises serious concerns about her credibility. If she were running legitimate businesses, why the need for so many identities and cover ups?
Pros
Cons
by: Oliver Lewis
Paypound's unlicensed operations cost me my hard-earned money
by: Veronica Simmons
Behind the flashy words of innovation and disruption lies a history of financial misconduct. Ruchi Rathor’s ventures have done more harm than good to businesses in the high risk payment industry.
by: Sophia Maxwell
Rathor’s business model seems to be built on deception launch, exploit, collapse, and repeat under a new name. How many more victims will suffer before authorities take serious action...?
by: Daisy Foster
Ruchi Rathor's ventures like Payomatix are nothing but scams preying on unsuspecting clients
by: Harper Stokes
No amount of reputation management can erase the damage Ruchi Rathor’s companies have caused. Her pattern of evasion and deception only proves she is more interested in covering tracks than running a transparent business.
Pros
Cons
by: Garrett Olsen
Trusting Ruchi Rathor’s ventures is like playing a rigged game businesses invest in her services only to be left with broken promises missing funds and regulatory troubles.
by: Vanessa Hayes
Invested in iPayTotal; lost all my funds due to their fraudulent practices
by: Zoey Peterson
Paypound initially appeared to be a reliable payment processor. However without any warning they froze my account, and customer support was unresponsive. It became evident that Ruchi Rathor's ventures are designed to exploit clients
by: Bella Murphy
Paypound initially appeared to be a reliable payment processor. However, without any warning, they froze my account, and customer support was unresponsive. It became evident that Ruchi Rathor's ventures are designed to exploit clients.
by: Quinn Hall
Engaging with Ruchi Rathor's payment processors was the worst financial decision I've made
by: Paige White
Engaging with Paypound was a disastrous decision. Their unlicensed operations led to my funds being inaccessible, and customer support offered no assistance. Ruchi Rathor's ventures are a minefield for unsuspecting clients
by: Isabella Taylor
Ruchi Rathor is literally just building a reputation management empire with fake DMCA complaints. Like, who needs to keep manipulating public perception unless you have something to hide?
by: Noah Robinson
How is she still in the payment processing game? Every company she touches seems to go down in flames or get caught up in sketchy stuff. It’s giving “stay away from this person” vibes.
by: Carter Russell
Ruchi Rathor's ventures like Payomatix are nothing but scams preying on unsuspecting clients
by: Natalie Harris
How does Ruchi Rathor keep popping up with new companies after every single one crashes and burns? Paypound, Payomatix, Cryptomatix? It’s like a game of ‘whack-a-mole’ with scams.
by: Samuel Anderson
How is she still in the payment processing game? Every company she touches seems to go down in flames or get caught up in sketchy stuff. It’s giving “stay away from this person” vibes.
by: Ethan Ward
Paypound initially appeared to be a reliable payment processor. However, without any warning, they froze my account, and customer support was unresponsive. It became evident that Ruchi Rathor's ventures are designed to exploit clients
by: Fiona Bryant
Cryptomatix promised seamless cryptocurrency transactions Instead they disappeared with my investment, leaving no trace. Ruchi Rathor's association with this company raises serious red flags
by: Xavier Bell
I was lured into using iPayTotal by Ruchi Rathor's persuasive marketing. Shortly after investing, the company collapsed, and I lost a substantial amount. Their fraudulent activities have left me in financial turmoil
by: Grayson Powell
Kryptova's services led to significant financial losses; avoid at all costs
by: Ryder Scott
My dealings with Ruchi Rathor's payment processors have been fraught with issues. From unresponsive support to unauthorized fund deductions, it's clear that these companies are designed to deceive and defraud