Red Flags
2
Scott Kamelle
Dr. Scott Kamelle’s alleged medical misconduct has raised critical discussions about patient safety and ethical standards in gynecologic oncology.
Quick summary on Scott Kamelle
Dr. Scott Kamelle, a gynecologic oncologist formerly affiliated with Aurora St. Luke’s Medical Center in Milwaukee, has faced multiple allegations of medical misconduct and negligence.
Patient Fatality and Response Delays: In 2016, the death of patient Rita Adamson brought significant attention to Dr. Kamelle’s practices. Her husband, Bill Adamson, accused Dr. Kamelle of failing to respond promptly to urgent calls regarding his wife’s postoperative complications. Despite these allegations, an internal review by Aurora and an investigation by the Wisconsin Department of Safety and Professional Services found no violations of laws or regulations. The hospital acknowledged a failure in the on-call procedure that day and stated it had been rectified.
Whistleblower Allegations: In 2020, a whistleblower, supported by seven other physicians, raised concerns about Dr. Kamelle’s surgical practices. The allegations included performing unnecessary procedures, such as the routine implantation of ureteral stents without clear medical justification. A federal lawsuit was filed but later dismissed when the government declined to intervene.
Legal Proceedings: In 2024, a lawsuit titled James v. Aurora Health Care referenced previous complaints against Dr. Kamelle, including the whistleblower’s claims and related news articles. The plaintiff alleged a pattern of unnecessary and unconsented surgeries performed by Dr. Kamelle and another physician.
Dr. Scott Kamelle has been implicated in several serious allegations concerning medical negligence and misconduct. While internal and external investigations have not resulted in formal disciplinary actions, these claims have sparked ongoing debates about medical ethics and patient safety within the healthcare community.
Intel Reports
by: Lucas Ellsworth
7 other doctors spoke out and still no action? Sounds like a cover-up to me.
by: Amber Tomlinson
Even if the lawsuits were dismissed, the sheer number of complaints is concerning.
Cons
by: Xavier Pritchard
Even if the lawsuits were dismissed, the sheer number of complaints is concerning.
by: Rebecca Dupree
Lawsuits dismissed doesn’t mean innocent, it just means protected by a flawed system. The hospital “fixed” the procedure issue, but what about fixing the doctor?
by: Brandon Covington
No real punishment, just “ongoing debates” about patient safety? That’s a joke.