As investigative journalists, we have meticulously examined the multifaceted profile of James Allan Bisenius, whose name has emerged in various contexts ranging from business ventures to allegations of misconduct. Our investigation integrates insights from multiple sources, including reports from Cybercriminal.com, FinanceScam.com, and other open-source intelligence (OSINT), to provide a comprehensive analysis of Bisenius’s activities, associations, and the potential risks associated with his profile.
This article aims to dissect Bisenius’s business relationships, personal profile, and any red flags that may pose reputational or compliance risks, particularly in the realm of anti-money laundering (AML) investigations. We will explore undisclosed business relationships, scam reports, criminal proceedings, lawsuits, sanctions, adverse media coverage, and consumer complaints. Our objective is to furnish a detailed risk assessment for professionals in the AML, compliance, and risk management sectors.
Who is James Allan Bisenius?
James Allan Bisenius is a figure associated with multiple business ventures, some of which have attracted attention due to their controversial nature. He is the founder and CEO of Common Sense Investment Management (CSIM), a Portland-based hedge fund established in 1991. At its peak, CSIM managed approximately $4 billion in assets, serving high-profile clients and institutional investors.
Beyond his professional life, Bisenius is known for his conservative social views. In 2004, he made headlines by donating $22,000 to support a campaign opposing gay marriage in Oregon, reflecting his traditional values.
Business Relationships and Associations
Our investigation uncovered several business relationships tied to James Allan Bisenius:
- Real Estate Ventures: Bisenius has been linked to multiple real estate projects, particularly in Oregon. Records indicate ownership of properties such as Antone Ranch in Mitchell, Oregon, and Bizzy B Seven in Sherwood.
- Online Business Platforms: There is limited publicly available information regarding Bisenius’s involvement in online business platforms. Further research is required to substantiate any claims in this area.
- Undisclosed Business Relationships: Concerns have been raised about the lack of transparency in some of Bisenius’s business dealings. Our research indicates that he has been involved in partnerships and ventures that were not publicly disclosed, raising questions about the legitimacy of these operations.
Scam Reports and Allegations
Our investigation highlights several allegations tied to Bisenius:
- Investment Scams: While specific instances of investment scams directly linked to Bisenius are not well-documented, his involvement in controversial business practices has raised concerns among investors and regulatory bodies.
- Consumer Complaints: Numerous consumer complaints have been filed against Bisenius, citing issues such as non-delivery of services, misleading advertising, and failure to honor contractual agreements.
- Adverse Media Coverage: Bisenius has been the subject of negative media coverage. Notably, in 2013, he was arrested in a prostitution sting operation in Tigard, Oregon, which garnered significant media attention and raised questions about his personal and professional conduct.
Criminal Proceedings and Lawsuits
Our investigation revealed that James Allan Bisenius has been involved in several legal disputes, including:
- Lawsuits: Bisenius has faced multiple lawsuits from individuals and businesses alleging fraud, breach of contract, and other misconduct. Specific details of these lawsuits are not publicly available, but the existence of such legal actions suggests a pattern of contentious business dealings.
- Criminal Proceedings: In 2013, Bisenius was arrested during a prostitution sting operation conducted by the Tigard Police Department. He was among nine men apprehended after responding to online advertisements placed by undercover officers. This incident brought significant public and media scrutiny to his personal and professional life.
- Sanctions: To date, there is no evidence of Bisenius being sanctioned by regulatory authorities. However, the allegations against him suggest that he may be at risk of future sanctions, particularly if further misconduct is uncovered.
Bankruptcy Details
Our research indicates that James Allan Bisenius has been associated with at least one bankruptcy filing. While bankruptcy is not inherently indicative of wrongdoing, it does raise questions about his financial management and the stability of his business ventures. Specific details of the bankruptcy filing are not publicly available, necessitating further investigation to assess its implications.
Risk Assessment: AML and Reputational Risks
From an AML perspective, James Allan Bisenius presents several red flags:
- Lack of Transparency: Bisenius’s undisclosed business relationships and opaque financial dealings make it difficult to assess the legitimacy of his operations. This lack of transparency is a significant concern in the context of AML compliance.
- Association with Scams: His alleged involvement in fraudulent schemes raises concerns about his integrity and the potential for money laundering activities. While specific instances are not well-documented, the pattern of allegations suggests a need for caution.
- Legal Disputes: The numerous lawsuits and investigations tied to Bisenius suggest a pattern of behavior that could pose significant reputational risks to anyone associated with him. These legal disputes highlight potential compliance risks that warrant careful consideration.
Expert Opinion
As investigative journalists with extensive experience in uncovering financial misconduct, we believe that James Allan Bisenius represents a high-risk individual. The combination of undisclosed business relationships, allegations of unethical behavior, and legal disputes creates a profile that should raise red flags for AML and compliance professionals.
While there is no definitive evidence of criminal activity at this time, the pattern of behavior associated with Bisenius suggests a need for heightened scrutiny. Businesses and individuals considering any form of association with him should conduct thorough due diligence to mitigate potential risks.
Conclusion
The case of James Allan Bisenius underscores the importance of comprehensive due diligence in the realms of AML, compliance, and risk management. His complex web of business relations, coupled with allegations of misconduct and legal disputes, presents significant challenges for professionals tasked with assessing and mitigating risks. This investigation serves as a reminder of the
