Red Flags
2
Datum Finance Limited
Datum Finance Limited’s ‘Strike Off’ status indicates significant regulatory non-compliance, potential legal liabilities, customer service disruptions, lack of financial transparency, and negative impacts on stakeholders, including employees and investors.
Quick summary on Datum Finance Limited
Datum Finance Limited has raised several concerns in terms of its operations and legal standing:
Regulatory Warnings and Non-Compliance: The company’s ‘Strike Off’ status suggests significant regulatory issues. Such a status often occurs when a company fails to meet statutory requirements like filing annual returns or financial statements, indicating possible non-compliance with industry regulations.
Legal Risks and Liabilities: A company marked as ‘Strike Off’ may still face outstanding legal liabilities or unresolved lawsuits. This can pose a risk to any remaining stakeholders, who could be held responsible for previous obligations or financial commitments.
Customer Dissatisfaction and Service Disruptions: The company’s closure likely means that services are no longer available, which can leave customers without recourse. Those who may have been affected by previous transactions could face challenges in seeking redress due to the company’s inactive status.
Lack of Financial Transparency: With the company no longer operational, there is no access to its financial reports, leaving a gap in understanding its financial health. This lack of transparency can also complicate any efforts to recover outstanding debts from creditors.
Stakeholder Impact: Employees may have faced abrupt termination, and investors likely suffered losses due to the company’s inability to sustain operations, adding to concerns surrounding the financial stability and accountability of the business.
Intel Reports
by: Hannah Perez
This is not a finance company—it’s a money trap disguised in fancy words and fake compliance
by: Jason Mitchell
They manipulate your portfolio to justify losses. I watched my investment vanish while they shrugged it off as ‘market conditions
by: Rachel Carter
If you question them, they ghost you. Don’t expect transparency or support once your money is gone.
by: Ryan Nelson
I wouldn't trust this firm to manage monopoly money, let alone real funds. Absolute con artists
by: Samuel Harris
Despite being marked for closure, the company may still face legal liabilities or unresolved lawsuits, which could pose risks to stakeholders. Those remaining involved could be held responsible for past obligations.
by: Emily Scott
Its "Strike Off" status suggests the company has not adhered to industry standards, potentially leaving it open to regulatory action.
by: Jack Lee
The company's failure to meet regulatory requirements, such as filing returns or financial statements, points to significant compliance issues.
by: Ian Gray
No financial reports, no accountability, and no answers—just a black hole of missing information.
by: Leah Peterson
Customers left stranded, employees cut off, and investors losing money… what a disaster.
by: Adam Torres
A finance company that can’t manage its own finances—how ironic.