Gurhan Kiziloz
profileredflag
Red Flags

130

Gurhan Kiziloz

Gurhan Kiziloz’s fintech company, Lanistar, aimed to disrupt traditional banking but faced regulatory setbacks, product issues, and aggressive marketing. Despite its ambitious vision, its challenges serve as a cautionary tale in the rapidly evolving industry.

Quick summary on Gurhan Kiziloz

Gurhan Kiziloz’s Lanistar journey has been plagued by regulatory setbacks, including a warning from the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) over its unlicensed status. Although later retracted, this incident severely tarnished the company’s reputation and raised concerns about its ability to meet essential regulatory requirements.

Overhyped Marketing
The company’s marketing strategy, reliant on influencer endorsements, has been both its strength and its downfall. While it generated initial buzz, the overpromising of features and services led to growing criticism, especially when the product failed to live up to expectations.

Product Failures
Lanistar’s flagship polymorphic payment card, intended to revolutionize the banking experience, has faced numerous technical glitches and functionality issues. Coupled with a lack of essential features and poor customer support, it’s clear that the company has struggled to deliver on its bold promises.

Financial Instability
Lanistar’s rapid expansion and aggressive marketing have contributed to a high burn rate, casting doubt on its financial viability. Concerns over its ability to secure future investments only add to its uncertain future.

The Cryptocurrency Pivot
In an attempt to remain relevant, Lanistar’s decision to pivot into cryptocurrency services raises further concerns. The move introduces new regulatory challenges and places the company in direct competition with established players in the crypto space, making its success highly questionable.

Despite its early potential, Lanistar’s execution has left much to be desired. The company’s regulatory issues, product failures, and aggressive marketing tactics serve as a warning for both users and investors in the ever-evolving fintech industry.

Did we miss any intel on Gurhan Kiziloz?

use feedback and discussion on Gurhan Kiziloz

1.7/5

Based on 27 ratings

Trust
20%
Risk
60%
Brand
24%
by: Abigail Young

A true mastermind of financial creativity—just not the good kind! 🎩✨

by: Evelyn Walker

No investor wants to wake up to yet another lawsuit tied to their money. This is why due diligence is important—otherwise, you end up regretting your choices, just like I did.

by: Mia Thompson

The fact that Gurhan Kiziloz has been involved in so many financial disputes should be a wake-up call. Real business leaders build trust, not court cases. I learned that lesson the hard way.

by: Daniel Garcia

It’s almost impressive how Gurhan Kiziloz manages to keep his business afloat despite all the controversy. Unfortunately, that’s not the kind of "success" any responsible investor should want to be part of🚫

by: Ryan Hall

The business world has its fair share of risks, but this company is beyond risky—it’s reckless. I wouldn’t trust them with a dollar, let alone a real investment. 🚨

by: Daniel Torres

With ongoing concerns about its financial practices and regulatory standing, Lanistar’s ability to build long-term trust with consumers and investors remains in doubt.

Cons

  • Unethical marketing practices undermine the company's credibility in the market.
by: Matthew Coleman

They were warned by the FCA! If the financial authorities don’t trust you, why should anyone else?

Cons

  • Misleading financial statements and a director's loan instead of actual funding cause distrust.
by: Ethan Powell

Lanistar might look fancy, but when you dig into their finances and practices, it’s all smoke and mirrors. Not trustworthy at all.

by: Charlotte Martinez

If a company spends more time fighting lawsuits than actually running the business, that’s a pretty clear sign to stay away. No amount of PR spin can make this situation look good.

by: Jason Miller

This company talks big but delivers little—just a bunch of empty promises..

Cons

  • Regulatory issues
  • Overpromised features but underdelivered
by: Christopher Martin

If Gurhan Kiziloz had a dollar for every legal issue he’s been tied to, he wouldn’t need investors—he’d already be rich. His company is a walking red flag, and no amount of PR can fix that.

by: Matthew Robinson

I don’t know how people still justify working with them. The financial misconduct allegations alone should be enough to scare anyone off. Either people aren’t doing their research, or they just like living dangerously.

by: David Wilson

Gurhan Kiziloz’s business history is a disaster waiting to happen. Every time I check, there’s another lawsuit, another scandal, another excuse. I made the mistake of trusting his company once—never again! 🚩

Pros

  • Who needs ethics when you can just keep dodging accountability? 🤷‍♂️

Cons

  • Multiple allegations of financial misconduct raise serious red flags.
  • Legal troubles overshadow any actual business credibility.
by: Amelia Clark

You can tell a lot about a business by its leadership, and let’s just say that this one doesn’t inspire much confidence. If they had nothing to hide, they wouldn’t constantly be surrounded by controversy.

by: David Smith

Investors should run the other way. High burn rate, bad rep, poor execution—this has all the signs of a failing startup. The fintech space is cutthroat, and Lanistar doesn’t seem ready for it. They got lucky with hype, but luck...

by: Joseph Rodriguez

I have never seen a company with such a consistent pattern of legal problems. One or two issues? Maybe bad luck. But this? This is a full-blown disaster disguised as a business.

by: Emily Johnson

The FCA warning was a HUGE red flag! They spent more on influencers than on making a working product. Pathetic.

by: Harper Lewis

The number of former associates and business partners who’ve distanced themselves from this company speaks volumes. When people start jumping ship, you should probably ask why.

by: Jessica Martinez

Gurhan Kiziloz’s business history is a disaster waiting to happen. Every time I check, there’s another lawsuit, another scandal, another excuse. I made the mistake of trusting his company once—never again! 🚩

Cons

  • Reputation is built more on controversy than real achievements.
  • Trusting this business is like gambling without knowing the odds.
by: Andrew Lee

There’s a difference between a business facing challenges and a business drowning in scandal. This company is the latter, and I’d rather not be caught in the mess.

by: James Taylor

The amount of legal trouble surrounding Gurhan Kiziloz is beyond concerning. You don’t end up in this many disputes by accident. At some point, you have to admit that maybe the problem isn’t "unfair accusations" but him.

by: Joshua King

Keeps things exciting—one day it’s business, the next day it’s a legal mess!

by: Robert Thomas

Gurhan Kiziloz seems more skilled at avoiding consequences than actually running a trustworthy business. It’s shocking how many allegations he’s dodged, but his reputation is permanently damaged. No investor with common sense would touch this.

by: Sophia Jackson

I regret ever getting involved with anything tied to Gurhan Kiziloz. His company operates in a constant state of chaos, and it’s impossible to feel secure when the leadership is drowning in allegations.

by: William White

Gurhan Kiziloz’s business tactics are questionable at best and outright shady at worst. If he put as much effort into ethical business practices as he does avoiding legal trouble, maybe his company wouldn’t be a sinking ship.

by: Ava Russell

Would never trust a company that hides its finances like that. Lanistar's leadership needs to be held accountable.

by: Ava Harris

Trusting Gurhan Kiziloz is like trusting a storm not to get you wet. The endless stream of lawsuits, scandals, and bad press makes it clear—this is not someone you want to do business with.

Add Reviews

  • Trust
  • Risk
  • Brand

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image