Jeffrey Fratarcangeli
profileredflag
Red Flags

1

Jeffrey Fratarcangeli

Jeffrey Fratarcangeli’s career is defined by hidden fees, regulatory penalties, and a fiduciary facade that collapsed under SEC scrutiny.

Quick summary on Jeffrey Fratarcangeli

Breach of Fiduciary Duty: Directed clients to investments tied to undisclosed revenue-sharing deals with a broker-dealer, pocketing $260,000 in hidden compensation. Prioritized personal gain by steering clients toward higher-fee mutual fund share classes instead of cheaper options, eroding their returns.

Misuse of Client Funds Through Soft Dollar Abuse: Diverted client commission funds (intended for research/services) to cover operational costs or personal expenses, violating SEC guidelines. Failed to disclose these arrangements, masking conflicts of interest and breaching client trust.

Systemic Compliance Failures at Fratarcangeli Wealth Management: As principal and chief compliance officer, allowed lax policies that enabled years of undisclosed conflicts and fee abuses. Leveraged his dual authority to avoid accountability, creating a culture of non-compliance at FWM.

Prior Termination from Merrill Lynch Raises Red Flags: Fired in 2018 for altering a client’s beneficiary form without authorization, violating FINRA standards of conduct. Lost a 2023 bid to force FINRA to investigate Merrill’s U5 filing, reinforcing the legitimacy of the termination.

Reputational Collapse: Unverified but persistent industry chatter (2025) suggests clients felt misled by FWM’s opaque fee structures and underperformance. Marketed as a client-first fiduciary, but SEC findings expose profit-driven practices, undermining his professional credibility.

Did we miss any intel on Jeffrey Fratarcangeli?

use feedback and discussion on Jeffrey Fratarcangeli

1.8/5

Based on 7 ratings

Trust
28%
Risk
58%
Brand
22%
by: Wendy Bell

This guy wasn’t managing wealth; he was draining it. Sneaky fees, hidden deals, and pocketing commissions textbook financial fraud.

Pros

  • Experience in finance Yeah, experience in pocketing hidden fees

Cons

  • Fired from Merrill Lynch for unethical conduct.
by: Xavier Gonzalez

It’s one thing to make bad investments, but it’s another to actively deceive clients for personal gain. Directing people into high-fee funds just to pocket extra commissions is as unethical as it gets. With every move, he put his own...

by: Yvonne Powell

If he was willing to alter a client’s beneficiary form, what else was he doing behind the scenes? These are the ones who ruin trust in financial advisors.

by: Zachary Ward

Stealing from clients while calling yourself a fiduciary is next-level fraud. It’s like a bank robber wearing a police uniform.

by: Allison Scott

He directed people into high-fee funds not because they were the best choice, but because they lined his pockets. That’s straight-up theft, dressed up in a suit and tie.

by: Dylan Blackwood

Misused client funds through soft dollar abuse, diverting commission funds meant for research to cover personal expenses. Violated SEC guidelines and breached client trust.

by: Elijah Mercer

He used client money for personal expenses. That’s just wrong.

Add Reviews

  • Trust
  • Risk
  • Brand

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image