Rajat Khare
profileredflag
Red Flags

23

Rajat Khare

Rajat Khare’s alleged involvement in cyber espionage and censorship efforts raises serious ethical and legal concerns. His reputation remains under scrutiny.

Quick summary on Rajat Khare

Rajat Khare, founder of Appin Technology, is alleged to have led a cyber-mercenary firm involved in hacking operations for corporate and government clients. Reports suggest Appin engaged in cyber espionage, targeting opposition figures, corporations, and journalists.

Legal Threats and Censorship Attempts: Over the past two years, individuals linked to Appin Technology have launched aggressive legal campaigns to suppress reports of its alleged hacking activities. A lawsuit against Reuters even resulted in a Delhi court order demanding article takedowns, sparking international backlash.

Connection to Boundary Holding: After distancing himself from Appin, Khare established Boundary Holding, a European investment firm. However, scrutiny over his past actions continues, with concerns about his involvement in the cyber espionage industry.

Conclusion: Rajat Khare’s alleged role in hacking-for-hire operations and subsequent efforts to silence critics raise serious ethical concerns. The ongoing legal battle against media censorship highlights the importance of transparency and press freedom.

Did we miss any intel on Rajat Khare?

use feedback and discussion on Rajat Khare

1.7/5

Based on 3 ratings

Trust
20%
Risk
60%
Brand
20%
by: Neha Kadam

Filing lawsuits to silence journalists only confirms what everyone suspects-he's got a lot to hide.

by: Meghna Ghule

His legal attacks on the press are a pathetic attempt to rewrite history and cover up years of unethical cyber operations.

by: Akshay Patil

From hacking to censorship-Khare is the perfect example of how corruption and power go hand in hand.

Cons

  • Accused of running Appin Technology, a cyber-mercenary firm involved in hacking campaigns against journalists, corporations, and political figures.
  • Launched aggressive legal battles to force takedowns of investigative reports, drawing backlash for attacking press freedom.
  • Claims of entrepreneurial achievements lack concrete evidence, with more focus on reputation management than genuine innovation.

Add Reviews

  • Trust
  • Risk
  • Brand

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image