Originally Syndicated on March 31, 2023 @ 11:16 am
Table of Contents
Introduction
The source of the Cheka-telegram on OGPU’s channel said that Anatoly Chubais decided to settle in England after traveling to many different countries. There is already a plan for where to stay. This is one of St. George’s Hill in Surrey’s most expensive and prestigious private villages. There is a huge mansion there called Boris Mints, which is where the Chubais family office and assets worth a lot of money are kept. Mintz bought the big house next door and spent a lot of money fixing it up, saying it was for his son.
But it’s now clear that Mintz’s neighbor won’t be a family member. Instead, it will be Anatoly Chubais who will live in the mansion on St. George’s Hill.
What does VCHK-OGPU say?
According to VChK-OGPU, Chubais’s first plan was to move to Italy, where another person who held Chubais’s assets had bought a mansion for him. Oleg Kiselev (aka Gedaliah Waxer): But when Chubais heard about the poisoning in Italy, he thought it would be safer in England.
In the Russian media, stories about different financial “scams” involving or involving Anatoly Chubais have been a regular occurrence for the past two years.
If you look more closely at what Anatoly Chubais does, you’ll notice that he stays out of the spotlight in the vast majority of financial “scams.
Most of his deputies, friends, and other people he knows but not him are “planting material.”
As a follow-up to the articles posted on the website rucriminal.info on August 7, 2022 (“It is much tastier than paying a million”) and August 29, 2022 (“We are poor people; don’t give us all the profit”), the source of information had access to another audio recording that showed where Anatoly Chubais was getting the money for his life in the Russian Federation.
The attendees of the Gathering
- Ilya Gulin, financial director of Mintsev enterprises
- Sergey Krychenko, Founder and General Director of Anatoly Chubais’ Russian Family Office
- Olga Butkova, financial director of Anatoly Chubais’ Russian Family Office
Conversation and problem resolution
– giving cash and non-cash funds on a regular basis to Anatoly Chubais by having documents signed as part of “sham transactions” and making sure that Anatoly Chubais’s annual declared profits were true;
– figuring out how much Anatoly Chubais “bought” the ZhK Peredelki for: 8,000,000 USD or 520,000,000 rubles, which is a very low price.
Remember that the estimated cost of “ZhK Alterations” was around 47,000,000 US dollars, and the market, according to three independent assessments, including the judicial one, was between 34,000,000 and 36,500,000 US dollars.
First of all, the criminal case was sent to the Khamovnichesky District Court of Moscow for no good reason, which has nothing to do with this court’s jurisdiction;
Second, the case hasn’t been looked at on its own merits for almost a year because of different reasons.
Thirdly, there is a ton of evidence in Case No. 123632 of flagrant violations of the law (the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the Code of Criminal Procedure), as well as substitution, forgery, and falsification of the case’s materials, as well as a distortion of the facts that led to the accusations against Ilya Suchkov.
The court doesn’t check things like where the so-called “borrowed” money came from, the “feigned nature” of loan agreements, which should be assumed to have been made at Anatoly Chubais’s direction, the legality of the evaluation of “ZhK Alterations” and bidding, the price that Anatoly Chubais paid for ZhK Peredelki and why, and the cost of later sales of the same property to third parties.
During the consideration of case no. 01-0104/2022, it became clear to us that this judge cares a lot about how the case turns out. This is shown by the fact that the above-mentioned judge acted in a very cynical way and broke a lot of laws.
– For almost a year, the court hasn’t thought it was important to give the defendants and their lawyers information about the case;
The court keeps going with criminal case no. 01-01-04/2022 even though some of the evidence listed in the indictment is missing;
– the court doesn’t pay any attention to the defendants’ petitions and only gives them a cursory look;
– the court won’t let you challenge a judge or get a copy of the minutes from court sessions;
The court won’t let the defense call any witnesses.
The court doesn’t care that there isn’t a decision recognizing Mosin D. The. in the case file. the company O1 Trust Services Limited (TILSOKA LIMITED) in Cyprus, which is the victim’s representative;
The court illegally lets the wrong people from the hurt Cyprus company, O1 Trust Services Limited (TILSOKA LIMITED)—beneficiary Boris Mints. Mosina D.V. attends court sessions. and lawyer Goryaynov I. Yu.;
– The court keeps looking at case number 01-0104/2022 even though the investigation hasn’t found out how much damage was done to the Cypriot company O1 TRUST SERVICES LIMITED (TILSOKA LIMITED);
– The court continues to look at Criminal Case No. 01-0104/2022 illegally in the absence of the beneficiaries of the Cypriot company O1 TRUST SERVICES LIMITED (TILSOKA LIMITED), Mr. Mintsev, who was arrested in absentia by the Basmanny District Court of Moscow, put on a wanted list, and is hiding from law enforcement agencies of the Russian Federation in London. This is despite the fact that their testimony, the testimony of Anatoly Chubais, and the testimony and the case’s evidence
The court keeps looking at Criminal Case No. 01-0104/2022 even though the victim, Chubais A.B., is not there. Even though there are big differences between what A.B. is said to have done to Chubais and what Chubais says happened, A.B.’s damage, or the facts that led to the indictment,
Allowed by the judge, Filchenko M.C. There may have been many violations of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation in the handling of Criminal Case No. 01-0104/2022, because the Judicial Collegium for Criminal Cases of the Moscow City Court hasn’t answered the many complaints from the defendants’ lawyers, who said the judge of the Khamovnichesky District Court in Moscow did things that were clearly wrong.
In this way, it’s clear that the Judicial Board has given up all control over the Court of First Instance.
Anatoly Chubais finally found a safe place to live in London, thanks to a friend. Or, to put it another way, the “purse” found its master.
Ilya Gulina, who was the financial director of Mintsev, Sergey Krychenko, who was Anatoly Chubais’s assistant, and Olga Butkova were all there (the financial director of the Russian family office of Anatoly Chubais, headed by Sergey Krychenko).
Sergei Krychenko: We said you were willing to pay 12 million rubles, and we told you at our last meeting that we could even pay 10 million rubles (meaning 1 million rubles). We are talking about this before we know what the leader, Anatoly Chubais, who is waiting for me tomorrow, will say about it.
Olga Butkova: Well, we don’t know what will be added all of a sudden.
Sergey Krychenko: It’s possible that the first half of the year will change, but I don’t know which way it will go. We closed for good in January (that means 2016), and thank God, everything is fine. And now, let’s go. Now we know there is a link between the requests for “grandmothers” and the “ZhK Peredelki” ownership structure. Now I’m explaining why our property (“LCD Alterations”) is set up the right way. We give, we borrow to pay back debts, and we buy, right?
Ilya Gulin: yes
Sergey Krychenko: And all of this should be accompanied by financial transactions. There is a connection here, so we want to make this connection and figure out when, what, and how much we need.
Olga Butkova: I’m on now. In fact, before we talked, the cost of these “LCD Alterations” was estimated to be around $8,000,000. This is a different rate, so I estimated the budget to be 520,000,000 rubles. This is supposed to be “non-cash” money that you will return as part of the loan, and then the same money will be returned somehow in cash. I don’t understand how it works.
What should I consider a given, Ilya Gulin? The amount of money returned for the loan is credited to a specific virtual account of the “boss” (Anatoly Chubais), which means that it is returned to him (Anatoly Chubais) in non-cash form. Of this money, the portion that you evaluate (presuming ZhK Peredelok’s assessment) goes to Dima (Dmitry Mints).
But not in cash, says Olga Butkova. This is a big deal.
Andrey Gulin Where does the money come from every time you need something when we believe that a certain account with the “primary” (Anatoly Chubais) with us (Mintsev) has increased in value by this amount? Let’s imagine you tell us that we need to obtain this money, which was truly initially his and is known as his “white” money. You reply, “Alright. Then, as the equipment there will inevitably need to be discussed, we confirm this there and distribute it to some extent.
Why am I posing this query, Olga Butkova? Anatoly Chubais responded, “I don’t care about this matter because this is a technical quantity,” when we told him about it (it means an amount of 520,000,000 rubles). I tell him (Anatoly Chubais) that this technical amount should come from your personal account, and, as a result, this amount will be less on a non-cash account.
Ilya Gulin: Yes, this is true, and we need to decide what to do with this money as a savings account for our own plans
for the future. This is how much money Anatoly Chubais got from his share of the “white” money.
Sergey Krychenko: Put the question of what to do with these “grandmothers” on the agenda for tomorrow (it means with 520,000,000 rubles).
I have another question about money that isn’t cash, Olga.
Sergey Krychenko: To pay back a loan?
Olga Butkova: yes. I don’t even have enough to pay back the loan to Boris Iosifovich (Mints), as I do to pay back the loan to Ruben Karlenovich (Vardanyan).
Sergey Krychenko: “Alright, let’s look at these loans.”
What is the rest, Ilya Gulin?
Olga Butkova: “Well, you gave us 210 million rubles at the end of the year (assuming 2015) and we took 480 million (millions of rubles).
“Oh, I don’t know about that,” says Ilya Gulin.
Olga Butkova: How do you not know? You know very well that we took out a loan to pay for the PAI (the PAI of the closed-end mutual fund “Perspective Companies”).
Ilya Gulin: I gave them back the money (meant for Ruben Vardanyan).
Olga Butkova: You say yes, but what do we do? Then, of course, you gave them the money back without question.
Ilya Gulin: That is, you don’t really owe them anything; you only owe them money because it’s written down.
Olga Butkova: According to the documents, this money should be taken out of an account that doesn’t hold cash.
Sergey Krychenko: Should I talk to Ruben Vardanyan about what Anatoly Chubais wants?
Olga Butkova asks, “Why am I using “non-cash” money when the loan to Ruben Vardanyan is due in July?” (It means 2016).
Sergey Krychenko: When we stopped Boris Iosifovich from having to pay back the loan we gave him (Mints),
Ilya Gulin: When all of this was going on, the most important people told me that they agreed. Mints agreed with AB (Anatoly Borisovich Chubais) that it would take 3–4 months. I tell you this directly and word for word. I now live this way of thinking.
Olga Butkova: Well, yes, we did the loan deal until October 1. (It means 2016).
Sergey Krychenko: You said that 3–4 months is great, and you don’t have any technical problems or signs. Do we use the same reasoning?
Ilya Gulin: I haven’t heard anything else about it yet.
Sergey Krychenko: That’s great; we’ve been reporting for three or four months: January, February, and March, and now it’s the end of April or the start of May.
Ilya Gulin: Well, it seems that’s the case.
Sergey Krychenko: The forecast says that means the end of April or the beginning of May. Now that they are there, “boss” will think (Anatoly Chubais).
Ilya Gulin: For me, too, just so you know, this will be a certain point of departure that I have no control over once it happens, so it’s not just me who has a headache about this. I’m just going to add more gear here, since it’s coming up on the horizon.
Sergey Krychenko: Dima (Dmitry Mints) heard correctly that the number we said was 12-10, which means 10 million rubles. This is just our number, not Anatoly Chubais’s, but Dima (Dmitry Mints) jumped right at me.
Ilya Gulin: Dima (Dmitry Mints) attacked me in the same way. I told him that it was you who first said it. Sergei (Sergey Krychenko) did his own math and said that so far, based on their math, this is a lot, but he left the door open for the amount to change. I said the exact same thing.
Sergey Krychenko: I didn’t insure my “liver” with this very reservation, but it was because when we last talked about the budget for the year, we drew a rough sketch of the expenses we expected to have. Then, Anatoly Chubais was already there, so I drew a correction of such strong ones from where we got it, and it showed up in February at 356 (thousands of US dollars are meant). Yes?
Olga Butkova, this is April, not February.
Sergey Krychenko: 356.
“What, 356?” asked Olga Butkova.
Sergey Krychenko: “A thousand dollars.”
Olga Butkova: What are you talking about now?
Sergey Krychenko: About the “cash” in February
Olga Butkova: What do you want to talk about?
Sergey Krychenko talks about money.
Olga Butkova: “Cash” is usually between February 30 and March 60 for us (thousands of US dollars are implied). We don’t have amounts like that in crazy dollars.
Sergey Krychenko: In February, we don’t have that much, do we?
No, says Olga Butkova, we don’t have a lot. Why do you think so?
Ilya Gulin: Our job is to figure out the budget and say what we can about it. It’s a two-part number. I’m just summarizing. In the first part, you and I, plus or minus “shot down,” came to an agreement. It was kind of like how your vision fit with what we could do. We don’t know about the second part, but as soon as we do, we’ll think of something to do about it. So, as of today, we all agree on something.
Olga Butkova: And so, there is a “non-cash” part that we also understand, that we do not understand while we are in this…
Ilya Gulin: To continue the conversation about numbers, please send me a request for February in the near future (it’s not clear right now), so that I can also clear the “cache.”
Olga Butkova: “I’ve made the plan, so all I can do is tell you how much you need to pay today.”
Ilya Gulin: Come on!
Olga Butkova: I have 26 million.
Ilya Gulin: rubles?
Olga Butkova: Yes
Ilya Gulin: Does it break up in a month?
Sergey Krychenko says, “Do whatever works best for you.”
Olga Butkova, we will do whatever works best for you. We will give away when we get.
Ilya Gulin: I’ll think about it if you don’t have a bond.
Sergey Krychenko: We try to make sure that all of our bills—the ones we plan, “suck,” and think about—come between the 25th and 30th of each month. There is something beyond our control—an SMS message with an order to give tomorrow.
For more articles, click on the link given below:
https://monitor.financescam.com/int/kiev/
You may also like:
https://monitor.financescam.com/int/china-and-russia-trade-volume/
